• The Women in Engineering and Science panel discussion, part of the CEE Alumni/ae Day, included (left to right) Professors Sallie W. Chisholm, panel chair; Lorna J.Gibson, chair of the Gender Equity Study in the School of Engineering; and alumnae Karla H. Karash and Diane M. McKnight.

    Photo / Donna Coveney

    Full Screen

Study points to career/family concerns among women engineering faculty


Press Contact

Elizabeth Thomson
Email: thomson@mit.edu
Phone: 617-258-5563
MIT Resource Development

Media Resources

1 images for download

Access Media

Media can only be downloaded from the desktop version of this website.

Preliminary results of a study on women faculty in the School of Engineering show that a common concern is balancing career and family.

About half the School's women faculty don't have children, said Professor Lorna J. Gibson, chair of the study. "Many feel that it's difficult for women to have this career and a family," she said.

Professor Gibson, who holds appointments in three MIT engineering departments, introduced the results last Wednesday at a panel discussion on women in science and engineering.

The discussion also elicited hearty support from the audience for a similar study released last year on the status of women faculty in the School of Science. Both the dean of engineering at Cambridge University in England and a professor at Technion University in Israel said that the latter work also describes the situations at their respective institutions, and has been closely studied.

The panel discussion was organized for the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) Alumni/ae Day, held in conjunction with its New Millennium Colloquium on the Future of Civil and Environmental Engineering (see article on page 1).

Professor Sallie W. (Penny) Chisholm, who holds appointments in CEE and biology, led the panel, which also included Professor Gibson (materials science and engineering, mechanical engineering and CEE), Dr. Karla H. Karash (SB 1968, SM, PhD) of Multisystems, and Professor Diane M. McKnight (SB 1975, SM, PhD) of the University of Colorado at Boulder.

Professor Chisholm introduced the panel's topic by applauding the overall increase in women on campus. To that end, she told a tale about a wealthy 1965 MIT alumnus who was being given a tour of the campus. After watching all the women streaming by, he commented, "Is there a women's conference going on?"

Dr. Karash noted, however, that of the CEE students graduating from 1970-99, only 4 percent of the women currently hold positions of president, vice president, CEO, chairman or owner compared to 18 percent of the men. Where are the women? In the more technical fields: 39 percent had the word "engineer" in their titles, compared to 17 percent of the men.

She firmly believes, however, that "what we need is more time. If we come back in 20 years, we'll see more women in management and as full professors."

Is there something limiting the numbers of women succeeding in academia? The School of Science report showed "subtle, unintentional discrimination that was interfering with the success of women rising through the ranks," said Professor Chisholm, one of the report's authors. The full report, which was embraced by the MIT administration, is on the MIT Faculty Newsletter web site.

EARLY FINDINGS

A draft report of a study for the School of Engineering modeled after the School of Science work should be ready by the end of the Spring term, Professor Gibson said. In the meantime, she reported a few of the findings so far, which are based on interviews with almost all of the women faculty and on data for things such as tenure success rate and years from tenure to full promotion.

The interviews revealed concerns surrounding three main issues: family, mentoring and promotion, and interactions within the department. With respect to family, Professor Chisholm related how one faculty member told her "my opportunity for having children is past, and that's the penalty I pay for getting tenure at MIT."

Professor Gibson later recalled a lunch she attended for women faculty and students in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering. One of the students' key questions: how do you balance career and family? "But none of us has children," said Professor Gibson. "And you could just see all these students crossing off professor [as a career track]."

Many women faculty felt a lack of feedback or advice from colleagues in the department. The women also said that they're uncomfortable with the self-promotion necessary to get ahead. Said one: "I toot my own horn, but I feel like I have to take a shower afterward."

Within their departments, "there was a feeling by some of exclusion from influential committees," Professor Gibson said. "And quite a few talked about the small number of female faculty." There are only 31 women in an engineering faculty of 340. As a result, some departments have only a few women and one has none.

There is also good news. From the data collected so far, the team has found that the tenure success rate for faculty members hired between 1977 and 1993 was almost identical for men and women. Women faculty also were appointed to named chairs in proportion to their fraction of the faculty.

The team is still analyzing salary data, but with respect to outside activities, it found that until this year no women faculty members in the School of Engineering had startup companies. Now three do.

Members of the committee producing the School of Engineering study are Professors Gibson and Chisholm, Professor Edward F. Crawley of aeronautics and astronautics, Professor Mary Boyce of mechanical engineering, Professor Karen K. Gleason of chemical engineering, Professor Nancy A. Lynch of electrical engineering and computer science and Professor John B. Vander Sande of materials science and engineering.

A version of this article appeared in MIT Tech Talk on March 29, 2000.


Topics: Technology and society, Alumni/ae, Faculty, Special events and guest speakers

Comments

Back to the top