• Micrograph shows a group of Ralstonia eutropha bacteria in culture. In their natural form, as seen here, the microbes convert carbon in their surrounding into a kind of bioplastic — seen as the light-colored dots inside their membranes. But a biologically engineered version developed at MIT instead produces isobutanol fuel, which is then expelled from the cells into the surrounding medium, where it can easily be collected.

    Image courtesy of Christopher Brigham

    Full Screen

Teaching a microbe to make fuel

Genetically modified organism could turn carbon dioxide or waste products into a gasoline-compatible transportation fuel.


Press Contact

Sarah McDonnell
Email: s_mcd@mit.edu
Phone: 617-253-8923
MIT News Office

Media Resources

1 images for download

Access Media

Media can only be downloaded from the desktop version of this website.

A humble soil bacterium called Ralstonia eutropha has a natural tendency, whenever it is stressed, to stop growing and put all its energy into making complex carbon compounds. Now scientists at MIT have taught this microbe a new trick: They’ve tinkered with its genes to persuade it to make fuel — specifically, a kind of alcohol called isobutanol that can be directly substituted for, or blended with, gasoline.

Best of 2012

Christopher Brigham, a research scientist in MIT’s biology department who has been working to develop this bioengineered bacterium, is currently trying to get the organism to use a stream of carbon dioxide as its source of carbon, so that it could be used to make fuel out of emissions. Brigham is co-author of a paper on this research published this month in the journal Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Brigham explains that in the microbe’s natural state, when its source of essential nutrients such as nitrate or phosphate is restricted, “it will go into carbon-storage mode,” essentially storing away food for later use when it senses that resources are limited.

“What it does is take whatever carbon is available, and stores it in the form of a polymer, which is similar in its properties to a lot of petroleum-based plastics,” Brigham says. By knocking out a few genes, inserting a gene from another organism and tinkering with the expression of other genes, Brigham and his colleagues were able to redirect the microbe to make fuel instead of plastic.

While the team is focusing on getting the microbe to use CO2 as a carbon source, with slightly different modifications the same microbe could also potentially turn almost any source of carbon, including agricultural waste or municipal waste, into useful fuel. In the laboratory, the microbes have been using fructose, a sugar, as their carbon source.

At this point, the MIT team — which includes chemistry graduate student Jingnan Lu, biology postdoc Claudia Gai, and is led by Anthony Sinskey, professor of biology — have demonstrated success in modifying the microbe’s genes so that it converts carbon into isobutanol in an ongoing process.

“We’ve shown that, in continuous culture, we can get substantial amounts of isobutanol,” Brigham says. Now, the researchers are focused on optimizing the system to increase the rate of production and designing bioreactors to scale the process up to industrial levels.

Unlike some bioengineered systems in which microbes produce a desired chemical within their bodies but have to be destroyed to retrieve the product, R. eutropha naturally expels the isobutanol into the surrounding fluid, where it can be continuously filtered out without stopping the production process, Brigham says. “We didn’t have to add a transport system to get it out of the cell,” he says.

A number of research groups are pursuing isobutanol production through various pathways, including other genetically modified organisms; at least two companies are already gearing up to produce it as a fuel, fuel additive or feedstock for chemical production. Unlike some proposed biofuels, isobutanol can be used in current engines with little or no modification, and has already been used in some racing cars.

Mark Silby, an assistant professor of biology at the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth, says, “This approach has several potential advantages over the production of ethanol from corn. Bacterial systems are scalable, in theory allowing production of large amounts of biofuel in a factory-like environment.” He adds, “This system in particular has the potential to derive carbon from waste products or carbon dioxide, and thus is not competing with the food supply.” Overall, he says, “the potential impact of this approach is huge.”

The work is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E).


Topics: Biofuels, Biology, Carbon dioxide, Chemistry and chemical engineering, Emissions, Energy, Faculty, Graduate, postdoctoral, Innovation and Entrepreneurship (I&E), Research, Students, Transportation, Genetic engineering

Comments

What would happen if a genetically engineered nano-refinery, an algae or bacterium tuned to fix CO2 or digest anything it touches and spit out flammable, toxic, volatile, hydrocarbons, escaped into the open water? "Life finds a way..."
Will the microbes be able to survive and produce the intended derivative product in an open environment or within a controlled indoor laboratory environment? What are the costs and maintenance associated with first generation microboes and subsequent generations? More questions to come later. THANKS in advance.
There's a huge difference between feeding a bug reduced carbon for isobutanol production and it feeding carbon dioxide. Then there's the source of reduced carbon, which would need to be vast and very cheap. This story reminds me of this PhD Comic: http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174 .
What if the state of stress on the microbe be out put, so that the carbon clustering be done in vivo as the primary metabolite???? The state of stress that lead to stop multiplication and clustering of carbons, may get changed to the state of uniform production even in the stress condition...it can be done.
I am interested in this kind of research so have few doubts. Are there any toxic chemicals produced at the time of secretion of isobutanol? If so, what measures you have taken to detoxicate them? Is it possible to produce on a commercial scale with less expense?
i m intrested in such kind of research can u give me some references .
Back to the top